The Mesh Current Method, also know as the Loop Current Method, is quite similar to the Branch current method in that it uses simultaneous equations, Kirchhoff Voltage Law, and Ohms Law to determine unknown currents in a network. It differs from the Branch current method in that it does not use Kirchhoff Current Law, and it is usually able to solve a circuit with less unknown variables and less simultaneous equation, which is especially nice if you're forced to solve without a calculator
The first step in the Mesh Current method is to
identify “loops” within the circuit encompassing all components. In our
example circuit, the loop formed by B1, R1, and R2 will be the first
while the loop formed by B2, R2, and R3 will be the second. The
strangest part of the Mesh Current method is envisioning circulating
currents in each of the loops. In fact, this method gets its name from
the idea of these currents meshing together between loops like sets of
spinning gears:
The choice of each current's direction is entirely arbitrary,
just as in the Branch Current method, but the resulting equations are easier to
solve if the currents are going the same direction through intersecting
components (note how currents I1 and I2 are both going “up” through
resistor R2, where they “mesh,” or intersect). If the assumed direction of a
mesh current is wrong, the answer for that current will have a negative value.
The next step is to label all
voltage drop polarities across resistors according to the assumed directions of
the mesh currents. Remember that the “upstream” end of a resistor will always
be negative, and the “downstream” end of a resistor positive with respect to
each other, since electrons are negatively charged. The battery polarities, of
course, are dictated by their symbol orientations in the diagram, and may or
may not “agree” with the resistor polarities (assumed current directions):
Using Kirchhoff's
Voltage Law, we can now step around each of these loops, generating
equations representative of the component voltage drops and polarities.
As with the Branch Current method, we will denote a resistor's voltage
drop as the product of the resistance (in ohms) and its respective mesh
current (that quantity being unknown at this point). Where two currents
mesh together, we will write that term in the equation with resistor
current being the sum of the two meshing currents.
Tracing the left loop of
the circuit, starting from the upper-left corner and moving
counter-clockwise (the choice of starting points and directions is
ultimately irrelevant), counting polarity as if we had a voltmeter in
hand, red lead on the point ahead and black lead on the point behind, we
get this equation:
-28 + 2 (I1 - I2) + 4I1 = 0
Notice that the middle
term of the equation uses the sum of mesh currents I1 and I2 as the
current through resistor R2. This is because mesh currents I1 and I2 are
going the same direction through R2, and thus complement each other.
Distributing the coefficient of 2 to the I1 and I2 terms, and then
combining I1 terms in the equation, we can simplify as such:
-28 + 2 (I1 - I2) + 4I1 = 0 Original Form of Equation
..Distributing to terms within parenthesis..
-28 + 2I1+ 2I2 + 4I1 = 0
-28 + 2I1+ 2I2 + 4I1 = 0
..Combining like terms..
-28 + 6I1 + 2I2 = 0 Simplified Form of Equation
At this time we have one equation with two unknowns. To be able to solve for two unknown mesh currents, we must have two equations. If we trace the other loop of the circuit, we can obtain another KVL equation and have enough data to solve for the two currents. Creature of habit that I am, I'll start at the upper-left hand corner of the right loop and trace counter-clockwise:
-2 (I1 +I2) +7 - 1I2 = 0
Simplifying the equation as before, we end up with:
-2I1 - 3I2 +7 = 0
Now, with two equations, we can use one of several methods to mathematically solve for the unknown currents I1 and I2:
-28 + 6I1 + 2I2 = 0
-2I1 - 3I2 + 7 = 0
..rearranging equation for easier equation..
6I1 + 2I2 = -28
-2I1 - 3I2 = -7
Solutions:
I1 = 5 A
CASES TO BE CONSIDERED FOR MESH ANALYSIS
CASE 1
A current source exists only in one mesh
CASE 2
A current source exist between two meshes
We can write one mesh equation by considering the current source. The current source is related to the mesh currents at by
i1=i2+1.5
In order to write the second mesh equation, we must decide what to do about the current source voltage. Notice that there is no easy way to express the current source voltage in terms of the mesh currents. In this example, illustrate two methods of writing the second mesh equation.
Apply KVL to the supermesh corresponding the current source. Shown in blue, this supermesh is the perimeter of the two meshes that each contain the current source.
Apply KVL to the supermesh to get
9i1+3i2+6i2-12=0 or 9i1+9i2=12
This is the same equation that was obtained using method 1. Applying KVL to the supermesh is a shortcut for doing three things.
1. labeling the current source voltage as v
2. applying KVL to both meshes that contain the current source
3. eliminating v from the KVL equations
In summary, the mesh equation are
i1=i2+1.5
and
9i1+9i2=12
by simplying this, the equation results to
i1=1.4167 A and i2=-83.3 mA
Reflection:
In this topic : Mesh analysis , i have learned that it is use to solve planar circuits for the currents at any place in the circuit. this means that there no wires crossing to each other. The difference between a mesh and a loop is that, the mesh is a loop which does not contain any other loops within it while a loop is any continuity path that is available to a current flow from a given circuit. But so far in answering the mesh analysis, it is still challenging because it is hard for me to get equations in a given circuit especially in using matrix solving. I am troubling in using matrix because of lack of practice. That's why I have practice in order have correct answer to the problem.
No comments:
Post a Comment